The new golangci-lint version 1.60.1 has problems with typecheck when
linting remote files. We have certain pakcages that should never be
inlcuded in remote but the typecheck tries to compile all of them but
this never works and it seems to ignore the exclude files we gave it.
To fix this the proper way is to mark all packages we only use locally
with !remote tags. This is a bit ugly but more correct. I also moved the
DecodeChanges() code around as it is called from the client so the
handles package which should only be remote doesn't really fit anyway.
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
We should never try to reexxec when we are already root with
CAP_SYS_ADMIN. The code contained a bug when --cgroups=disabled is used
as it tried to perfom a reexec even when it was not needed.
Fixes: 900e29549a ("libpod: do not move podman with --cgroups=disabled")
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
The code currently tried to avoid joining the userns from conmon
directly and rather joined to only read the pid file and then send this
back to use so we could join the userns. From the comment this was done
because we could not read the pid file. However this is no longer true
as of commit 49eb5af301 and file is no always owned by the real user.
This means we can just remove this special logic and join the namespace
directly there. A test has been added to check the rejoin logic with a
custom uidmapping.
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
The expectation with --cgroups=disabled is that the current cgroup is
used by the container.
Currently the --cgroups=disabled is passed directly to the OCI
runtime, but it doesn't stop Podman from creating a new cgroup when it
doesn't own the current one.
Closes: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/20910
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
Moving from Go module v4 to v5 prepares us for public releases.
Move done using gomove [1] as with the v3 and v4 moves.
[1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove
Signed-off-by: Matt Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
it is the wrong check to do here since we need to setup the user
namespace even in the case we are running as root without
capabilities.
[NO NEW TESTS NEEDED] this happens in nested podman
Closes: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/20908
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
